
I aim to show in this post the links between Oprah’s new spiritual course and the occult teachings of organisations who claim to receive their revelation from ‘Masters’ from another plane (i.e. demons). After reading this I don’t think any Christian in their right mind would want to watch another Oprah show, or get involved in her New Age doctrine. The spirit of deception that Paul preached and warned about is so true, perilous times are not coming – they are already here!
Eckhart’s New Age teaching twists the Word of God, claiming to promote the ‘one thing’ Jesus spoke about. The truth is the ‘one thing’ Jesus spoke of was to hear the Word of God as recorded in the Hebrew Old Testament being expounded – not a wishy washy form undefined form of ’spirituality’.
In the Gospel story of Mary and Martha, Jesus says to Martha, “You are anxious and troubled about many things, but only one thing is needful.” (Luke 10:41)
As I was writing A New Earth, people would sometimes ask me, “What is the new book about?” And invariably, my answer would be, “I only ever write or speak about one thing.” What is that one thing? Spiritual awakening. (“The One Thing” an essay by Eckart Tolle)
The doctrine of Oprah & Eckhart is strikingly similar to New Age teachings of Alice A Bailey and her spirit medium ‘The Tibetan’.
Humanity now, perhaps more than in any previous time, has an opportunity to create a new, saner, more loving world. This will involve a radical inner leap from the current egoic consciousness to an entirely new one.
In illuminating the nature of this shift in consciousness, Tolle describes in detail how our current ego-based state of consciousness operates. Then gently, and in very practical terms, he leads us into this new consciousness. We will come to experience who we truly are—which is something infinitely greater than anything we currently think we are—and learn to live and breathe freely. (EckhartTolle.com/NewEarth)
COMPARE WITH THE TEACHINGS OF THE LUCIS TRUST, AN OCCULT ORGANISATION PROMOTING NEW AGE DOCTRINES OF ALICE A BAILEY…
The Arcane School was established by Alice A. Bailey in 1923 to help meet an obvious and growing demand for further teaching and training in the science of the soul.
The Arcane School was created as a training school for adult men and women in meditation techniques and the development of spiritual potentiality. The School provides sequential courses of study and meditation, and practical training in group service.
The Arcane School is nonsectarian, and respects the right of each student to hold his/her own view and beliefs. It does not rely upon an authoritarian presentation of any one line of thought or code of ethics. Material used in the lesson courses is drawn from a variety of sources. The knowledge, insight and wisdom, and capacity to wield spiritual energy resulting from work and training with the Arcane School should be expressed and applied in daily living service in helping to materialise the Plan of God and to aid in solving the problems of humanity.
The Arcane School is conducted by correspondence through headquarters in New York, London, and Geneva.
The Arcane School is nonpolitical and nonsectarian. All are served. Since 1923 tens of thousands of students have taken advantage of the training.
No charges are made by the School for its services. The work is financed through the Lucis Trust by the voluntary contributions of students and those interested in the work of the School and in the teaching. Each gives according to personal circumstances.
The purpose of the esoteric training given in the Arcane School is to help the student grow spiritually toward acceptance of discipleship responsibility and to serve the Plan by serving humanity. Esotericism is a practical way of life.
The function of the School is to assist those at the end of the probationary path to move forward on to the Path of discipleship, and to assist those already on that path to move on more quickly and to achieve greater effectiveness in service. (Lucis Trust website)
If you are wondering who the ‘Lucis Trust’ is, they are an organisation which stems from a group that was first named: ‘Lucifer Trust’ (although they deny this), as they revere Lucifer as one who is good – basically, they call light darkness and darkness light!
There are comments on the World Wide Web claiming that the Lucis Trust was once called the Lucifer Trust. Such was never the case. However, for a brief period of two or three years in the early 1920’s, when Alice and Foster Bailey were beginning to publish the books published under her name, they named their fledgling publishing company “Lucifer Publishing Company”. By 1925 the name was changed to Lucis Publishing Company and has remained so ever since.Both “Lucifer” and “Lucis” come from the same word root, lucis being the Latin generative case meaning of light. The Bailey’s reasons for choosing the original name are not known to us, but we can only surmise that they, like the great teacher H.P. Blavatsky, for whom they had enormous respect, sought to elicit a deeper understanding of the sacrifice made by Lucifer. Alice and Foster Bailey were serious students and teachers of Theosophy, a spiritual tradition which views Lucifer as one of the solar Angels, those advanced Beings Who Theosophy says descended (thus “the fall”) from Venus to our planet eons ago to bring the principle of mind to what was then animal-man. In the theosophical perspective, the descent of these solar Angels was not a fall into sin or disgrace but rather an act of great sacrifice, as is suggested in the name “Lucifer” which means light-bearer. (see source – but cover yourself with prayer before visiting this demonic site!)
What I have been trying to highlight in this post is that Oprah’s new initiative is nothing less than bringing the Occult teachings of organisations such as ‘Lucis Trust’ into the mainstream. There is an ongoing program to re-define humanity and steer us down the path toward anti-Christ, Christian beware!
Posted by bruisescolours on April 19, 2008 at 10:38 pm
I’ll put my disclaimer up first. I didn’t read past the first paragraph, so this comment can’t really be said to apply to anything past that.
That being said, if you stopped believing in imaginary friends, the threat posed by Oprah and her imaginary friends would cease to exist.
Posted by jesusblogger on April 19, 2008 at 10:58 pm
You have a very western secular perspective, if something can not be seen it does not mean it is unreal. I have never seen you and yet I know you exist.
Posted by bruisescolours on April 19, 2008 at 11:38 pm
Yes, but someone has seen me, and if so arranged, it would be possible for us to really see each other. I did not say invisible friend, but imaginary. It just seems strange for all these belief systems with equally compelling (or not compelling) evidence who all work against each other.
Posted by jesusblogger on April 19, 2008 at 11:48 pm
I did think my last example was quite weak, but I kept it in to see if you’d accept it or push back. What I will say is that God is real. But, obviously you won’t believe that because you haven’t experienced Him. I have and so my faith is more about trusting Him than a faith in His existence. To me that is a taken for granted now.
How do I prove to you that He is invisible and not imagined? I can not, you have to first believe, which I know will sound circular to you.
I could list ‘proofs’ such as healing of cancer in my family, personal words delivered revealing my own secret thoughts, the beauty of nature etc, etc… but if you don’t want to believe it would be pointless.
In terms of ’so many beliefs’ yes there are a lot. But broadly they fall into two categories, you’ll like this, they are: TRUE and FALSE.
There’s many that are false and only one that is true. Sounds exclusive, but to use another poor analogy… soap powders all claim to ‘remove more dirt’ but in reality there’s going to be one soap powder that is better than the others when you look close enough, even though they all seem pretty similar… religion is a bit like that.
Posted by bruisescolours on April 20, 2008 at 12:53 am
I recognize that your faith is about trusting him. I just don’t get why you can’t see that about the others you are denouncing. And don’t play that you aren’t denouncing them.
“The spirit of deception that Paul preached and warned about is so true, perilous times are not coming – they are already here!”
I am sure they could easily say the same about you.
Posted by jesusblogger on April 20, 2008 at 6:51 am
Ah! We’ve now come to the point where you need to have read my entire post in order to comment.
The class I am denouncing, I make no apology for denouncing it, runs contrary to the Bible and is in alignment with New Age Spirituality.
New Age Spirituality is not compatible with Christianity because it is based on beliefs such as there being many ways to God. Christianity teaches Jesus is the only way, hence His death, burial and resurrection. New Age also teaches that ‘God’ is not a personal being but a ‘force’ like nature, in fact to the New Age ‘God’ is really us – or our consciousness.
Whoever wants to follow these teachings can, but Christian’s should know how this kind of teaching impacts their faith.
My aim was to get people to stop and think, before blindly following one of their favourite TV celebrities.
Posted by bruisescolours on April 20, 2008 at 4:54 pm
“My aim was to get people to stop and think, before blindly following one of their favourite TV celebrities.”
I think that is certainly an admirable goal. I think it can be said about any celebrity, whether it be Oprah and New Age beliefs or Sean Penn an his liberalism or even a pastor and Christianity, because I think it is important for people to figure things out on their own.
I’ve now read the rest of the post You seem to be connecting Oprah through some 4 degrees of separation, to satanists. It’s the only reason I can find for brining up the name Lucifer, which may or may not highlight a deeper insidious plan by Oprah. I can understand why you would advise other Christians to steer clear. I can also point out that the dangers are about equal to the dangers I see from Christianity, which is that both lead one to spend their life in pursuit of an imaginary and therefore unobtainable goal. I’d much rather live for this life and to make this world the best of all possible worlds.
Posted by CSP on April 21, 2008 at 10:06 am
Mr. Tolle has no connection whatsoever to or any similarity to the work of Alice Baily, etc. His teachings are most closely attuned to Buddhism (”mindfullness”, in particular) and the tradition of esoteric Christianity.
Posted by jesusblogger on April 21, 2008 at 10:13 pm
CSP, I would disagree on the grounds that Tolle’s teachings are based on New Age beliefs and A. Bailey is one of the mother’s of the New Age.
Esoteric Christianity that you refer to is better described as the heresy of gnosticism and syncretism.
Posted by CSP on April 21, 2008 at 11:41 pm
The label “New Age” is a meaningless catch-all phrase. Gnostic Christians (e.g. Manicheans and Cathars) were slaughtered by the orthodox Church. They died for their faith in Christ. Tolle’s focus is on ego structure and content which is one of the Eightfold Path of Buddha (mindfulness). Be vigilant of one’s thoughts, emotions and will and do not use any of these to counter-act them. Only objectively observe. “Be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind.” [Rom 12:2]
Posted by jesusblogger on April 22, 2008 at 6:36 pm
Well, the phrase ‘new age’ is used by those who follow its teachings.
Buddhism is based on idolatry, Jesus was a Jew who did not believe in such idolatrous worship. How then can one say the two beliefs are related and compatible?
When they asked Jesus what was the greatest commandment He replied: “Love YHVH”. To love the God of Israel means to keep His commandements – as Jesus said and also not to worship idols.
Posted by CSP on April 22, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Some forms of Buddhism do not worship Buddha and some do, so you cannot make a universal statement about Buddhism and idol worship. Be specific. It is the same in Christianity. The Mormon faith, for instance, is very different from that of the Quakers.
Posted by jesusblogger on April 23, 2008 at 10:07 pm
An idol is not just a statue. An idol is any god other than YHVH, the God of Israel. We are to have NO other gods before, or beside Him. To do so is idolatry. Therefore, Buddhism is idolatry.
Posted by CSP on April 23, 2008 at 10:31 pm
You don’t understand Buddhism. If you know anything about the teachings of Buddha he never says ANYTHING about God or place himself in that position. So where do you get that there is another God in Buddhism or an idol of any kind? That would be antithetical to his teaching.
Posted by jesusblogger on April 23, 2008 at 11:00 pm
It is said that Buddha once tried to abolish the concept of God? Is this true? This would mean Buddha is incompatible with faith in YHVH.
Buddhism still teaches a path to perfection outside of Christ, this makes void Christ’s death for our sins… can you see my point?
Posted by Matt on April 24, 2008 at 1:06 am
Come on!
We’ve been waiting for the Anti-Christ for thousands of years.
Do we have to burn everyone who offers a new idea at the stake?
Posted by CSP on April 24, 2008 at 2:19 am
Buddhism started in India and Christianity in the middle east. They are both manifestations of the one true Universal Wisdom. Gnostic Christians understand that Buddha was teaching the same path of return as Christ. Orthodox Christianity created an institution, clergy and saints to stand between man and the Triune God.